Updated puzzle commentary
This commit is contained in:
parent
7461ab7536
commit
1d58d947ef
32
README.md
32
README.md
|
@ -12,9 +12,37 @@ That one seemed pretty straight forward. For each line, the solution immediately
|
|||
|
||||
## Day 3: Gear Ratios
|
||||
|
||||
For this I modified the solver class to pass in three lines at once, shifting one line down in each iteration, processing the numbers in the middle line and looking for additional symbols in the lines before and after.
|
||||
For this I modified the solver class to pass in three lines at once, shifting one line down in each iteration, processing the numbers in the middle line and looking for additional symbols in the lines before and after. The tricky part was to correctly track the data needed for processing of each line and discarding it in time, without resorting to reading all data in before processing.
|
||||
|
||||
It was a bit tricky to track the data needed for processing of each line and discarding it in time, without resorting to reading all data in before processing. I stumbled over quite a few bugs before making this work.
|
||||
I introduced the test framework for this puzzle while stumbling over quite a few bugs.
|
||||
|
||||
## Day 4: Scratchcards
|
||||
|
||||
For part 1, the algorithm simply matches winning numbers against numbers we have, and multiplies the current line result by two for every match (except the first).
|
||||
|
||||
For part 2 there is a list of numbers of card copies for the upcoming cards, wher the list index is always relative to the current line. This works because the copies are always applied contiguously over upcoming cards. Once a card has been processed, its copy value is deleted from the beginning of the list (index 0).
|
||||
|
||||
## Day 5: If You Give A Seed A Fertilizer
|
||||
|
||||
Originally, I had implemented this by reading all data in first, constructing a list of the seven mappings, each containing a list of mapping ranges. I rewrote this when I realized that the conversion can be done line-by-line by maintaining separate lists of "unconverted" and "converted" values. Each mapping range is applied to all unconverted values, and if one matches it is converted and moved into the list of converted values. At the end of a map all converted values are moved back into the unconverted list. Unconverted values simply remain unconverted for the next map.
|
||||
|
||||
For part 2, it is not necessary (and not feasible) to convert the input ranges into individual values to run through the existing algorithm. Instead I modified the algorithm to run on ranges of input directly. This means that a successful conversion can split a range in up to three parts, where one is moved into the "converted" pile, while the others remain unconverted.
|
||||
|
||||
## Day 6: Wait For It
|
||||
|
||||
This one I solved by calculating the roots of the function *f(x) = -time ^2 * x + distance* and determining the distance between them. Part 2 was the first puzzle that required 64-bit integers for the calculations.
|
||||
|
||||
## Day 7: Camel Cards
|
||||
|
||||
The first puzzle that I could not solve line-by-line (day 6 doesn't count). For this one I store all the card hands and assign them a "type", e.g. "four of a kind", when processing them by counting the different card values in a hand. The rest of work is done in a custom compare function. When all data is processed I just use the compare function to sort all card hands, and then multiply the resulting indices with the bids.
|
||||
|
||||
For part 2, each card hands gets a "joker type" analoguous to the "type", for which the number of joker cards is added to the highest number of a different card type.
|
||||
|
||||
## Day 8: Haunted Wasteland
|
||||
|
||||
Again a puzzle where I had to read in all of the data before starting the algorithm. It proved difficult to verify parts of the algorithm by hand, but part 1 was still pretty straight forward.
|
||||
|
||||
Part 2 was a bit sneaky. This is the first puzzle where the result is outside the 32-bit unsigned integer range. And it is solvable only because each starting node leads into a loop with one of the target nodes, where the length of the loop is a multiple of the length of the sequence of instructions. With this knowledge, one can stop traversing the network once each target node has been reached and calculate the result directly.
|
||||
|
||||
## Day 9: Mirage Maintenance
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue